Tuesday, October 23, 2012

A non-fiction writer follows Faulkner style

David Quammen is a science writer, but he told the New York Times last week that his style depends on a very famous fiction writer: William Faulkner.


I also like his explanation of how he started writing non-fiction. From the NYT story on his new book, "Spillover," about the threat of animal diseases jumping over to humans:

"He was having trouble getting published as a novelist, he said, and at a certain point he decided: 'I’m a white, middle-class male who had a happy childhood in Ohio. The world does not need me to be a novelist.' From reading authors like Stephen Jay Gould, Lewis Thomas, Annie Dillard and John McPhee, moreover, he discovered, he said, that 'nonfiction could be wondrous and imaginative, shapely and literary — it didn’t just have to be explanatory.'

"But his greatest influence as a science writer, Mr. Quammen insisted, was the seemingly unscientific William Faulkner, about whom he wrote both undergraduate and graduate school theses. Though few critics have been subtle enough to notice, he said, smiling, the structure of 'Spillover' was as intricate as that of 'Absalom, Absalom' or 'Light in August.'

“ 'There are four levels braided together like cords in a rope, all moving in the same direction,' he explained. 'Or that’s what the author thinks, anyway. "

Here are the notes from Week 2


 Writing Tools No. 1 and 2.

Where are the subjects and verbs of the sentences? Are the strong words at the beginning and ends of the paragraphs?

Let’s look at this story from the Sunday New York Times:



 The subjects and verbs are in yellow. The blue indicates I have a comment about the word order. And if we are lucky, I will remember what it is.



By Dan Barry
New York Times
ELYRIA, OHIO — Another day begins with a sound softer than a finger-snap, in an Ohio place called Elyria. In the central square of this small city, the gushing water fountain applauds the early-morning chorus of sparrows. A car clears its throat. A door slams. And then: click. 

(Note the lengths of the sentences in the opening graf, becoming shorter as you go until it draws down to that one last word.
Subjects and verbs are right next to each other. No search needed to find the verb that goes with the subject. It’s more immediate that way, more impact, especially with the active verbs he uses: begins, applauds, clears and slams. Note the personification of the fountain and the car.
Last of all, that wonderful word order on “an Ohio place called Elyria.” It gets the name of the place to the end of the sentence, but there’s also something about turning the noun Ohio into an adjective. Maia said it made it more like a fairy-tale place, which I thought was a good way of describing the effect. Whatever it is, it’s much more interesting than just saying, “in Elyria, Ohio.”)

The faint sound comes as 7:00 flashes on the clock of the Lorain National Bank building, looming over the square. The pull of a string — click — has sent life pulsing through a neon sign, announcing to all of Elyria that, once more, against the odds, Donna’s Diner is open

(What is the effect of all that passes before? Open, that’s what. The last word in the graf.)

Its proprietor, Donna Dove, 57, ignites the grill that she seems to have just turned off, so seamlessly do her workdays blend into one endless shift. She wears her blond hair in a ponytail and frames her hazel eyes with black-rimmed glasses that tend to get smudged with grill grease. She sees the world through the blur of her work.
A dozen years ago, Donna found a scrap of serendipity on the sidewalk: a notice that a local mom-and-pop restaurant was for sale. After cooking for her broken family as a child, after cooking for county inmates at one of her many jobs, she had come to see food as life’s binding agent, and a diner as her calling. She maxed out her credit cards, cashed in her 401(k) and opened a business to call her own.
Donna’s Diner. Donna’s.
You know this place: It is Elyria’s equivalent to that diner, that coffee shop, that McDonald’s. From the vantage point of these booths and Formica countertops, the past improves with distance, the present keeps piling on, and a promising future ispractically willed by the resilient patrons. 

(What is unsaid in the sentence ending with ”McDonald’s? He never defines the place that you all know except by throwing out some nouns. But we do know that place, that neightborhood gathering spot without him having to go into detail.)

It is where the recession and other issues of the day are lived as much as discussed. Where expectationsfor a certain lifestyle have been lowered and hopesfor salvation through education and technology have been raised. Where the presidential nomineesBarack Obama and Mitt Romney each hope that his plan for a way back will resonatewith the Donna Doves, who try to get by in places like Elyria — where the American dream they talk about can sometimes seem like a tease.
But for now, at least, the door to Donna’s is open. So take a seat. Have a cup of coffee. Maybe some eggs. 

(What are the subjects of the last two verbs here. What is the author doing and why is he doing it? Switching to the imperative and talking directly to the reader. Another way of engaging them.)

This morning, as usual, Pete Aldrich is helping Donna through the new-dawn isolation, turning on the coffee and being compensated by food and tips from the occasional delivery. In his early 50s, well-educated and from regional royalty, he has hitsome hard times, and may or may not have slept in his car last night, cocooned by his bundled possessions.
 
(“This morning” starts the graf and keeps the reader with the writer. Now we are talking about this morning, he is saying, just so you will know and stay with me. The reader should never become lost in time or space or person between grafs, sentences or even words. Guide them.)

Pete tries, though, he tries. Heoften leavesstraight from Donna’s for a job interview, hustling out with purpose, no matter that his thick-lensed eyeglasses are missing one arm. Something will turn up.

(Verb repetition. Works here. Don’t overuse it.)

That is the communal hope. Donna, for example, is dogged by the day’s anxieties. Why are her receipts going down? What lunch special can she offer to clean out the refrigerator? Should she buy less perch for her Friday fish fry? Can she slide a month on her electric bill? Since she already doesn’t have health insurance, what else can she cut?
“I’m just going in circles and circles and circles,” Donna says one day, gazing through smudged glasses. “And not getting anyplace.” 

(Note the attribution in the middle of the sentence and not at the end or beginning. What she says is more important than the attribution and deserves to be at the start and end. Exception: When switching in quoted material from one speaker to another. Then move the attribution to the start of the second person’s quote to alert the reader that another person is talking.)

The fresh aroma of coffee face-slaps the air. Soon the Breakfast Club regulars, that gaggle of Elyrian past and present, will be here to renew their continuing discussion of what was, is and isn’t in this city of 55,000. The presidential election sometimes serves as a conversation starter, like a curio placed between the salt and pepper shakers.
 
(Love the imagery of the curio placed between the salt and peper shakers.)

The multi-media presentation of this series is fairly amazing. It might make you think that writing text is not going to be enough to be a published author any more:

There’s one other exercise that we could do with this story: Go through it and speculate on how the reporter got each piece of information in it. It looks to me that he used every method of research we discussed last week: personal observation, interviews, public documents, maybe a camera to get the detail in Donna’s Diner, etc.

We won’t be spending this much time on these exercises in the future, but all of them introduce another way to analyze your own writing. Look for the phrasing you overuse.  Is your writing flabby with too many words? Are your verbs active? Do you rely on forms of “to be” and “to have” too much?

Now let’s talk about getting started on a piece of writing:

Find your focus. A topic is not a story. An issue is not a story. Find the piece you can focus on and go for it. (more below)
Find your audience (in some cases you may need to reverse those two actions). More importantly, identify the audience of the media where you hope to see your article published.
n  Are you aiming at an audience that is well-versed in the subject you are writing about? Or are you introducing them to it?
n  What is the proper tone and style for this audience? Will humor be appropriate?
n  What about length? Will there be any other elements to support your article (photos, graphics, etc.)?
Take a look at the handout I gave you on “Focus.” Turn to the third page on the “Five Stages of a Story.”
We are at the idea stage. But before we hear your ideas, two things to keep in sight: A topic is not a story idea. A subject is not a story idea. Try to write about a topic and you will never bring your story in for a landing. Now to mix metaphors: You need to bite off a digestible piece of the topic/subject, chew it well and make it palatable to the reader.

Story forms: Second page of the handout.

Here’s the link to the video on the inverted pyramid:


I’ll try to figure out how to get the sound working in the class room. Sorry about the glitch last week.

More story forms:

Block: Helps in technical stories. Sometimes in stories where the chronology is important (think Benghazi attack on consulate and Egyptian riot)

Layer Cake: Good for when you are casting back and forth among different time elements. You will need strong transistions.

Wineglass: My favorite. Combines the inverted pyramid but still allows for story telling.

Note the parts of the handout on organizing your story. My fav is the jot outline. That can be the outline you turn into me for your final project.


See Boswell comment on thread (first page of handout)

I keep tyring to get to this info in class, but have run out of time twice. So here it is for you to look at on your own. It’s entertaining, it’s advice worth reading on writing:


Want something different to get your writing juice flowing? Check this out (but do your assignment first):



The URL home for the above:


Not so entertaining, but good on editing and revision:

Next week: Eli Sanders on this article, which won him the Pulitzer:









Monday, October 15, 2012

Class notes from Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2012

Here are my class notes from Tuesday night, Oct. 9, 2012

The most important aspect of this class is that it gives you the nudge, the excuse, the necessity to write on a regular basis. The second most important thing you will take away from this class is the feedback you will get on your writing. You’ll get lots of editing from me, but just as important is the critiques you will get from your classmate. They won’t all agree, we hope they will be civil and I know they will be valuable. You have an audience. Listen to what it tells you.

            Also, starting on Tuesday, Oct. 23, I will be available for individual meetings with you, probably in the HUB, before this class meets. There is a calendar on the web site that I hope you can use to sign up for these voluntary sessions.

            Class anthology. http://www.blurb.com/user/Viatorium 
            The meeting about the anthology is Dec. 4, which is when you will meet Jessica Murphy, who teaches Winter and Spring quarters of this class.

            The books:
            “On Writing Well” by William Zinsser. For the purposes of this class, I skip the chapters on specific writing categories (science, business, sports, etc.) but I encourage you to read them.
            “The Indifferent Stars Above: The Harrowing Saga of a Donner Party Bride” by Daniel James Brown. The author will talk to us on Nov. 13 about this book and the proposal he wrote for selling his next book (coming soon) and the film rights.
            “Writing Tools: 50 Essential Strategies for Every Writer” by Roy Peter Clark. We will do these exercises each week, and if you want to hear directly from the author, I highly recommend this 

 


Roy Peter Clark is a very entertaining and effective writing instructor. Jaqui is a Pultizer winner and a great teacher. Ken Armstrong, another Pulitzer winner, is a skilled researcher and clear writer as well as a helluva nice guy. This is well worth the money and a day at the Seattle Library.

Let’s talk about interviewing:

From “The Craft of Interviewing” by John Brady:
“Interviewing is the modest, immediate science of gaining trust, then gaining information.”

“Above all: ask. Pursue the blind alleys; voice your human – as well as professional – curiosities. Ask intriguing, innumerable questions, with enthusiasm and only civil restraint. In the end, interviewing is less a technique than an instinct. An interview is simply a lively and thoughtful conversation. The more life and thought you invest in your questions, the more answers you’ll get.”

Decide whom to interview
Find experts on your subject; use them to find others.
You can write about anything if you know the right people to talk to and the right question to ask.

            Getting the interview
Call, e-mail, write. Be persistent
Don’t lie to get an interview; don’t pay (does that still apply?)
Ground rules: Set a time for the interview, expected length of time, a place, all at their convenience
Even when you call to set up the interview, it should be obvious you are informed and interested. That is because you have prepared for the interview . . .

Preparing for the interview
Read, read, read. Do other interviews first. Don’t show up as an ignoramus. 10 minutes prep for each minute of interviewing? That’s what the book recommends, but it’s more than I usually do.

Conducting the interview
Consider doing an interview outline, but be ready and willing to depart from it.
Another option: Write out your questions
Novice vs. an experienced interviewee. Treat the newbie with kindness.
Everyone spells their name to you. That’s when the novice realizes this may get published (and why you do it at the end of the interview), and that’s when you make sure you are being accurate. Their title, too.
To tape or not? I use it as a safety net. Don’t over-rely on it.
If you only have time for one question, what is it?
If you get more time, do you have questions to ask?
Ease into the uncomfortable questions
Bring a camera to remember what she wore, what the office looked like, what pictures on wall, etc. Don’t waste note-taking on that.
Arrange for follow up questions.
Also give them this opportunity: “And if you think of anything you’d like to add . . .”

After the interview
ASAP, go fill in your notes
Transcribe or mark your recording (“1:42 on tape he talks about when his dog ate his homework.”)
Type up your notes, file them with time and place so that you can easily retrieve specific information in them (Spreadsheet? Great for longer projects – ask Cheryl about hers.)

Follow-up
Send a thank-you, if appropriate. A politician who has been interviewed a thousand times won’t expect it, but someone who held the key to getting your story done, might.
Additional questions (you made arrangements for this, right?)
E-mail copies of published stories to people you interviewed (I don’t let interviewees preview what I am writing with a couple of exceptions: highly technical info, very complicated timelines or other such circumstances. Even then, I don’t send the entire story, just their part or the part I am worried about getting right). I have e-mailed to people who turned me down for interviews to let them know what they are missing.

What are "informed personal essays?"

The question came up in class about personal essays: What are they?

For the purposes of this class, I always describe them as "informed personal essays," which results in blank stares and confusion. Probably the best way I can explain what I think makes a good personal essay and what I mean by "informed" is to gives some examples.

Let's start with a story from Tyrone Beason, who writes for The Seattle Times' Pacific NW magazine:

The story is mostly an account of his experience learning to swim. But there is other reporting as well:
    -- Quotes from reading he has done about swimming;
    -- Statistics on the racial/ethnic breakdown of who knows how to swim;
    -- Information on local swimming lessions;
    -- An interview with an Olympic gold medal swimmer;
    -- Interviews with other swimmers.

The result is a full package: His experience set in context.

Here's another one from The Seattle Times. In it, food writer Matthew Amster-Burton writes about his knife-sharpening skills, or lack thereof. But he also interviews a sushi chef and writes about improving his skills with an instructor.

Last one. This from the New York Times. In this piece, Patricia Morrisroe writes about how Emma, the voice of a rental car's GPS system, affects the relationship with her husband of 22 years, her obsession with "Wuthering Heights" and her journey in England in search of a moor romantic enough to fit her image of these geological formations. It's part travel story, part reminiscience, part humor and all very entertaining. There is less "informed" and more "personal" in this essay, but there is still information on places she visited and an obvious knowledge of the Bronte masterpiece.